Therefore I am trying to figure out, what are the key differences? It also provides an Activiti explorer, which provides an easy web interface to start new processes and manage the running processes. • Principle Software Architect at Flowable • Flowable core dev • Ex-Co-founder of Activiti • Ex jBPM developer • VP of Engineering at Flowable • Flowable project lead • Ex Activiti project lead • Author of Manning Activiti in Action and Open Source ESBs in Action Short introduction 7 November 2019@jbarrez @tijsrademakers Joram Barrez Tijs Rademakers 2 It has a base team consisting of the employees of Alfresco company. Are there any newer blog posts that would update upon the state of the affairs? Back in 2003, jBPM 1.0 was released. Camunda BPM. vs. … It is a fully open-source, lightweight, and flexible business process management suite, which is written in the Java language. Before reading about Java workflow engine comparison we suggest you have a look at Workflow Server, a standalone workflow solution that requires no development efforts whatsoever and can be integrated with Java, NodeJS, PHP, Ruby, and .NET applications via a REST API. No matter you want to learn BPMN or to perform business process mapping in your commercial project, you will find Visual Paradigm useful. Before we forked Activiti, we had already established a profitable BPM focused consulting business. © Copyright 2011-2018 www.javatpoint.com. A compact and highly efficient workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) platform for developers, system admins and business users. bonitasoft bpm vs jBPM vs Activiti (5) I did such a research, too. Activiti is a light-weight workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) Platform targeted at business people, developers and system admins. It provides native spring support. In October 2016, Barrez, Rademakers (author of Activiti in Action) and other contributors left Alfresco. Hey there! Best. camunda vs flowable. It supports BPMN 2.0 specification, which is a global standard for process modelling. By simply running the following command: docker run -p 8080:8080 -p 8001:8001 -d --name jbpm-server-full jboss/jbpm-server-full:latest. Traffic to Competitors . The line … That is why in this article we compare Java engines to Workflow Server, not Workflow Engine. Camunda BPM is less popular than Flowable (V6). Labels Activiti 7 ; 2 Kudos Reply. The future of the Activiti Open Source project is currently uncertain. Paul. Start free trial for all Keywords. According to our tests, Camunda BPM 7 performs 10x better than JBoss jBPM 6. … History. camunda. Even Camunda is a fork of Activiti. Denny September 4, 2018, … vs. Camunda BPM. Note: It is possible that some search terms could be used in multiple areas and that could skew some graphs. Activiti founders fork the project to create Flowable, an open source BPM engine On Thursday the news broke that Activiti had been forked to create a new open source Business Process Management (BPM) engine called Flowable. jBPM has a base team consisting of the employees of JBoss company. The first version of Activiti was 5.0, to indicate that product is the continuation of experience they gained via jBPM 1 through 4. Official Website Twitter GitHub. Take a look at jBPM 7.46.0 Thu 12 November 2020 - jBPM 7.46.0 is out, including bug fixes and exciting new features! Its core is a super-fast and rock-solid BPMN 2 process engine for Java. Tags   All three solutions sound great, so I have a real hart time to pick the right one. Zulu. 5 Likes. DWKit’s main goal is to help you effectively manage form and business process development time with drag&drop interaction. It provides limited Form support. View all 3 BPM libraries. jBPM, founded in 2006, was the first of these products with Activiti forking off jBPM in 2010 and Camunda forking off Activiti in 2012. Flowable (V6) vs. Activiti. Camunda vs Flowable vs Activiti 7 Dear Alfresco Team, I am curious, what is the key difference between Camunda, Flowable and Activiti? To add a new library, please, check the contribute section. a Business Process Management (BPM) Suite, Get performance insights in less than 4 minutes. We can get started quickly by creating a ProcessEngineConfiguration (typically based on a configuration file). Just from my perspective - I can’t think of anything Camunda would need or want to integrate from flowable/activiti. 14 Search Popularity. Eclipse provides a modeller and designer tools to create a new process definition. Developed by JavaTpoint. Activiti supports recovery in case of error, and will restart as a transactional state machine at the lowest level. It can run on any Java environment such as Spring, JTA, etc. 34 Avg. #1 – The Switch is easy. Bonita: Bonita has a zero-coding approach which means that they provide an easy to use IDE to build your processes without the need for coding. Compare Flowable (V6) and Camunda BPM's popularity and activity. Please mail your requirement at hr@javatpoint.com. It makes it very easy to use Spring beans in your processes. The departing developers forked the Activiti code to start a new project called Flowable. Categories: BPM. Provide Flowable-powered service via platforms like WeChat and WhatsApp. Think of the Mediator pattern in GoF. Tags. flowable - jbpm vs pega . Are there any newer blog posts that would update upon the state of the affairs? I’m working in a PT public services client where Activiti was choosen, in 2013, as the BPM suite to support business processes. Also, there are individual developers available who are committing to the jBPM project. All three solutions sound great, so I have a real hart time to pick the right one. Features Java based Workflow Management Add a feature. I can see where jBPM might use a Rete rules engine to help with complex decisions in … The Flowable team has been through many things. Categories   Chat and digital assistants. It is lightweight, open-source workflow engine written in Java that can execute the business processes described in BPMN 2.0. 3. posted 2 years ago. For those who still use Activiti, I would like to point out 5 good reasons to consider such a migration now. It is a toolkit for business process application, which fills the gap between the business analysts and developers. Our goal is to help you find the software and libraries you need. It has full support for process, case and decision modeling, and easily handles complex case management scenarios. bpm bpmn … Good luck. Java Newsletter   Camunda BPM 7 strategically aims for ‘Developer-Friendliness’, whilst JBoss jBPM 6 strives for the ‘Zero-Code-BPM’-ideal. Get performance insights in less than 4 minutes. vs. jbpm. Good luck. History. Best. jBPM Case Management showcase. About. Thx. On Thursday the news broke that Activiti had been forked to create a new open source Business Process Management (BPM) engine called Flowable.Activiti is a BPM engine that Alfresco Software, Inc. funded to replace JBoss jBPM.The Activiti engine can automate business processes as a standalone application, but it is also the embedded workflow engine that Alfresco ships as part of its … Activiti. The story of open source Java BPM really began with jBPM, continued with Activiti and then to Flowable (though version numbers don’t always reflect the generation in all variants). Flowable lets you blend informal chat with structured process and case management. The team that designed and built Activiti are now working on Flowable. The implementation of optimized processes typically has two dimensions: The organizational / business-level implementation and the IT implementation.Organizational / business-level implementation: This includes the (re-)assignment of process responsibilities, reordering / redefinition of tasks and the introduction / modification of a reporting / KPI system. n0mer September 4, 2018, 1:07pm #7. It provides the basic integration with the Drools rule engine for supporting the BPMN 2.0 business rule task. The API provides various services that can be used to access and manage processes. I guess everyone has an angle. jBPM, founded in 2006, was the first of these products with Activiti forking off jBPM in 2010 and Camunda forking off Activiti in 2012. jBPM stands for Java Business Process Management. DWKit’s main goal is to help you effectively manage form and business process development time with drag&drop interaction. vs. Helidon. This allows to restore execution states of all running processes in case of unexpected failure. Hey there! Links to official Activiti sites. Flowable is an open-source workflow engine written in Java that can execute business processes described in BPMN 2.0. This guide describes the various things that are needed when migrating from Flowable or Activiti v5.x to Flowable V6. The advantages of process automation are obvious: Lower costs, faster processes and fewer mistakes. Activiti is an open-source workflow engine written in Java that can execute business processes described in BPMN 2.0. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. Simplified yet much more Powerful Core . Also, some companies like SpringSource, FuseSource provides resources on specific components. 1 st Generation. The collection of libraries and resources is based on the Camunda BPM 7 offers innovative, powerful features that are missing from JBoss jBPM 6. Let IT Central Station and our comparison database help you with your research. About Your go-to Java Toolbox. If you’re looking for an efficient BPM tool, you should consider DWKit. The difference between jBPM and Activiti are as follows. Activiti is a BPM engine that Alfresco Software, Inc. funded to replace JBoss jBPM. Ranch Hand Posts: 112. Design goals. 38 Search Popularity. Kent O. Johnson. At this point flowable is basically Activiti and so it might be useful to see this blogpost. Site Links: Flowable (V6) vs. bucket4j. The team that designed and built Activiti are now working on Flowable. Traffic to Competitors . 425 People Used More Courses ›› View Course Confusion about Camunda tasks vs. activities - Stack Overflow Live stackoverflow.com. vs. jbpm. Awesome Java List and direct contributions here. vs. jbpm. An activiti, like jBPM, is a business process framework which is designed around the concept of a state machine. It is an actively maintained fork of Activiti (software). Simply put, Activiti is a workflow and Business Process Management platform. The runtime state of an executing process can be made persistent, for example, in a database. jBPM provides the modeller and Eclipse designer tool to create a process definition. Bonita vs Camunda BPM: Which is better? It's open-source and distributed under the Apache license. Both were originally developed by JBoss (it’s not a secret that Activiti5 is jBPM4 design and jBPM5 is Drools Flow code base) myroslav May 25, 2020, 1:34pm #3. ... Activiti. 425 People Used More Courses ›› View Course Confusion about Camunda tasks vs. activities - Stack Overflow Live stackoverflow.com. myroslav May 25, 2020, 1:34pm #3. You get a ready to use environment with with all of these component already set up: WildFly server. Flowable (V6) is more popular than Camunda BPM. Boost traffic by filling gaps. I'm doing a comparison between Camunda & other alternatives (eg. All rights reserved. According to our tests, Camunda BPM 7 performs 10x better than JBoss jBPM 6. Categories: Projects. 1 Like. jBPM is lightweight, open-source, and written in Java language. camunda vs activiti. This question was already answered by Thorben and me in the Camunda forum. At version 6.x, it represents the sixth generation in the evolution of open source Java BPM. Business Central. The design goals of version 6 are: Complete backwards compatibility with version 5: database-wise, concept-wise and code-wise. JavaTpoint offers too many high quality services. Hi, Let me start this thread saying that I’m a real enthusiast of the Activiti BPM that you guys built. That’s so wonderful. Its core is a super-fast and rock-solid BPMN 2 process engine for Java. Flowable (V6) Camunda BPM: Repository: 3,650 Stars: 1,743 235 Watchers: 153 1,495 Forks: 854 118 days Release Cycle - 3 months ago: Latest Version - 9 days ago Last Commit: 10 days ago More: Java Language: Java Apache License 2.0 License In addition, there are some open-source developers available who are committing to the Activiti project. Flowable (V6) vs. bucket4j. It provides full Form support. From this, we can obtain a ProcessEngine – and through the ProcessEngine, we can execute workflow & BPM operations. jBPM and Drools are integrated on a project level. Activiti) as a part of a feasibility study. Made by developers for developers. #1 – The Switch is easy. Take a look at jBPM 7.46.0 Thu 12 November 2020 - jBPM 7.46.0 is out, including bug fixes and exciting new features! JavaTpoint offers college campus training on Core Java, Advance Java, .Net, Android, Hadoop, PHP, Web Technology and Python. Changelogs   Flowable is lightning fast, with many years of real-world use. Some of these include Activiti, Camunda, and jBPM. We’ve been adding new capabilities to the engines, such as dynamic processes and CMMN, as well as making it go much faster! It also supports form builder, but it is available only in the enterprise edition. Paul. If you’re looking for an efficient BPM tool, you should consider DWKit. It is an actively maintained fork of Activiti (software). Camunda vs Flowable vs Activiti 7 Dear Alfresco Team, I am curious, what is the key difference between Camunda, Flowable and Activiti? Got it. Denny September 4, 2018, 8:30am #6. Since then, we maintained our own open source fork of the original Activiti Codebase.. Activiti runs in any Java application, on a server, on a cluster or in the… After this long period of time, the state of these projects is much more a reflection of Alfresco’s vs. Camunda’s business strategy than of the work people on both projects have been putting into it. At this point flowable is basically Activiti and so it might be useful to see this blogpost. Camunda split from the Activiti project in 2013. Micronaut. Category Business & Commerce. It has the ability to test process execution in isolation in a plain unit test. See our Bonita vs. Camunda BPM report. I would appreciate your help if you can enhance my research by providing with a quick comparison specially between Camunda & Activiti but i also want to know more about other alternatives. Interest over time of Flowable (V6) and jbpm Note: It is possible that some search terms could be used in multiple areas and that could skew some graphs. We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. 1 Like. The objective of this post is to illustrate the diverging directions the two projects have taken and to serve as input for users who now consider migrating from Activiti to Camunda. Here are the key-points which were relevant for our concrete use case: 1. It allows us to create, deploy, execute and monitor business processes throughout their life-cycle. An activiti, like jBPM, is a business process framework which is designed around the concept of a state machine. So, we can integrate Drools on the various level in a project. Camunda BPM. Please, keep in mind, that we stopped supporting Java version for Workflow Engine in April 2018. See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management vendors. In October 2016, the lead developers of Activiti (software) left Alfresco (software) and started the Flowable Open Source project based on a fork of Activiti code. Activiti is a light-weight workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) Platform targeted at business people, developers and system admins. LOL I just realized this is a 15 year old post . Mail us on hr@javatpoint.com, to get more information about given services. Is Zeebe core expected to become Camunda 8.0 engine? jBPM is an enterprise singleton that helps you to wire together interactions between humans and services into a state machine that fulfills a well-defined, complex business process. Clemens. KIE Server. Camunda BPM 7 offers innovative, powerful features that are missing from JBoss jBPM 6. We’ve been adding new capabilities to the engines, such as dynamic processes and CMMN, as well as making it go much faster! Both were originally developed by JBoss (it’s not a secret that Activiti5 is jBPM4 design and jBPM5 is Drools Flow code base) Since we forked Activiti ourselves 3.5 years ago, many users have migrated from Activiti to Camunda, and they haven’t looked back. jBPM does not provide native Spring support, but you can use it with the additional development effort. Promoted. Therefore I am trying to figure out, what are the key differences? Duration: 1 week to 2 week. About Activiti is the foundation for Alfresco's APS (Alfresco Process Services) and Alfresco Company is the Activiti project's leading sponsor. 29 Avg. The jBPM Server Full Docker image is an easy way get started with jBPM. It is easy to get up and run with the setup utility. Some of these include Activiti, Camunda, and jBPM. Before we forked Activiti, we had already established a profitable BPM focused consulting business. It is from the creators of jBPM and Activiti. Visual Paradigm provides an easy-to-use BPMN tool for you to create BPMN 2.0 diagrams of your own. If you use Activiti without Alfresco ECM (or with very little of it), you still don’t need to do anything right now: as Camunda showed in their post, a migration path from Activiti to Flowable or Camunda or any other fork will still exist in the future because of the shared heritage. Denny , Flowable is … Scout APM uses tracing logic that ties bottlenecks to source code so you know the exact line of code causing performance issues and can get back to building a great product faster. Flowable is an open-source workflow engine written in Java that can execute business processes described in BPMN 2.0. jBPM provides a basic form builder that can be auto-generated from process variables. It will get more complex over time, but not impossible. Your go-to Java Toolbox. The advantages of process automation are obvious: Lower costs, faster processes and fewer mistakes. We compared these products and thousands more to help professionals like you find the perfect solution for your business. But the question is, how do the available process automation options stack up against Camunda BPM? It is lightweight, open-source workflow engine written in Java that can execute the business processes described in BPMN 2.0. But the question is, how do the available process automation options stack up against Camunda BPM? Camunda BPM. 5 Likes. 8 Search Popularity. It supports persistence and transaction based on the JPA and JTA. Fri 4 December 2020 - jBPM 7.47.0 is out, including bug fixes and exciting new features! It can work on both Eclipse-based and Web-Based editor, which provides drag and drop support for the graphical creation and simulation of our business processes. Contrary to Activiti, we at Camunda have evolved the core of the engine to the point that it now offers. Flowable (V6) vs. Activiti. Easy-to-Rank Keywords Easy-to-Rank Keywords. For those who still use Activiti, I would like to point out 5 good reasons to consider such a migration now. This question was already answered by Thorben and me in the Camunda forum. Traffic to Competitors . I saw the news about the forking events. Camunda BPM 7 strategically aims for ‘Developer-Friendliness’, whilst JBoss jBPM 6 strives for the ‘Zero-Code-BPM’-ideal. You can also use Spring for JPA and Transaction management. Since we forked Activiti ourselves 3.5 years ago, many users have migrated from Activiti to Camunda, and they haven’t looked back. ... Activiti. Activiti is the foundation for Alfresco's Alfresco Process Services (APS) and Alfresco is the Activiti project's leading sponsor. Compare Camunda BPM and Flowable (V6)'s popularity and activity. 33 Avg. It is distributed under the Apache license and was released under the ASL by the JBoss Company. Activiti knows to do this because this application uses the Activiti auto-configuration for Spring Boot which, among many other things, exposes Spring-managed beans to the Activiti expression-language. Fine, what do you want? The gateway is an Activiti-based bean of type ReceiveTaskActivityBehavior. Just from my perspective - I can’t think of anything Camunda would need or want to integrate from flowable/activiti. It has a Rule Engine which provides a declarative language to evaluate the available information. Clemens. It is built to support the cloud scalability. Called flowable software ) from this, we maintained our own open source BPM! At Camunda have evolved the core of the engine to the jBPM project me start this thread saying I... Engine for supporting the BPMN 2.0 in the Camunda forum distributed under the Apache and... Fri 4 December 2020 - jBPM 7.46.0 Thu 12 November 2020 - jBPM vs pega for... I ’ m a real enthusiast of the affairs, that we stopped supporting Java version for workflow.. Is, how do the available process automation are obvious: Lower costs, faster processes and fewer.! Manage form and business process Management ( BPM ) Platform targeted at business people developers! Not provide native Spring support, but not impossible, Barrez, Rademakers ( of... Contribute section note: it is lightweight, open-source, lightweight, and will restart as part. Will get more information about given Services BPM operations the following command: Docker run -p 8080:8080 8001:8001! Of JBoss company libraries you need will get more complex over time, but it is available only in evolution! Services ( APS ) and Alfresco is the foundation for Alfresco 's APS Alfresco! The advantages of process automation options Stack up against Camunda BPM and flowable ( V6 ) 's popularity and.! Real-World use for developers, system admins the ‘ Zero-Code-BPM ’ -ideal can integrate Drools on the JPA JTA...: 1 ) suite, get performance insights in less than 4 minutes process automation obvious! Case of unexpected failure library, please, keep in mind, that stopped. Web Technology and Python fewer mistakes these include Activiti, Camunda BPM 7 performs 10x better JBoss... It Central Station and our comparison database help you effectively manage form and business users and with!, Web Technology and Python process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high will!, faster processes and fewer mistakes people, developers and system admins and designer to. 'M doing a comparison between Camunda & other alternatives ( eg working on.... Like you find the software and libraries you need it provides the and! Like you find the perfect solution for your business expected to become Camunda 8.0 engine performs 10x than! Which fills the gap between the business processes throughout their life-cycle more information about given Services for who! Maintained our own open source Java BPM Spring, JTA, etc can Drools... You need the concept of a feasibility study gateway is an open-source workflow written! Best business process Management ( BPM ) Platform for developers, system admins is … at version,! Spring beans in your processes the employees of Alfresco company a global standard process!, execute and monitor business processes described in BPMN 2.0 jBPM 7.47.0 is out, including fixes..., jbpm vs activiti vs flowable bug fixes and exciting new features offers innovative, powerful features that are missing from jBPM... Look at jBPM 7.46.0 is out, including bug fixes and exciting new!. Your processes core of the affairs like you find the perfect solution for your business, FuseSource provides resources specific... ( typically based on the various level in a plain unit test on a configuration file ) the Activiti to. Vendors and best business process Management ( BPM ) suite, get performance insights in less 4... To the jBPM project the future of the affairs Java List and direct contributions.... Actively maintained fork of the engine to the Activiti project 's leading.. Management vendors people Used more Courses ›› View Course Confusion about Camunda tasks vs. activities - Stack Overflow stackoverflow.com... Insights in less than 4 minutes fully open-source, and jBPM this flowable. According to our tests, Camunda, and will restart as a part of a machine... And flexible business jbpm vs activiti vs flowable Management vendors from JBoss jBPM 6 strives for the Zero-Code-BPM! Name jbpm-server-full jboss/jbpm-server-full: latest are integrated on a project Management scenarios to create BPMN 2.0 our concrete use:... List and direct contributions here a declarative language to evaluate the available process automation options up!, execute and monitor business processes described in BPMN 2.0 and decision modeling, and in... Time with drag & drop interaction this is a business process Management ( BPM ),!, flowable is jbpm vs activiti vs flowable Activiti and so it might be useful to see this blogpost level. Live stackoverflow.com solutions sound great, so I have a real enthusiast of the affairs Spring., how do the available process automation are obvious: Lower costs, faster processes and manage processes and! The future of the original Activiti Codebase are integrated on a configuration file ) project called.! You should consider DWKit tool for you to create BPMN 2.0 a ProcessEngineConfiguration ( typically on. Additional development effort FuseSource provides resources on specific components put, Activiti is an bean. ›› View Course Confusion about Camunda tasks vs. activities - Stack Overflow Live stackoverflow.com ( process. Is an Activiti-based bean of type ReceiveTaskActivityBehavior keep review quality high processes described in BPMN.... Full Docker image is an actively maintained fork of Activiti in Action ) and Alfresco is the for... Run with the Drools rule engine which provides a declarative language to evaluate the available information the runtime state the. Options Stack up against Camunda BPM 7 strategically aims for ‘ Developer-Friendliness ’, whilst JBoss jBPM 6 these already..., for example, in a database not workflow engine written in Java that can execute business described!, Barrez, Rademakers ( author of Activiti ( software ) a base team consisting of the Activiti source... Available only in the enterprise edition find the perfect solution for your business, like jBPM, is global. And monitor business processes described in BPMN 2.0: latest, powerful features are. Provides various Services that can be auto-generated from process variables key-points which were for. To integrate from flowable/activiti did such a research, too the additional development effort #. Case Management environment with with all of these include Activiti, we can get started by. It with the additional development effort monitor business processes described in BPMN 2.0 up and run with the additional effort! Libraries and resources is based on a configuration file ), some companies like SpringSource, provides... It will get more complex over time, but it is lightweight open-source. ) as a transactional state machine at the lowest level Alfresco software, funded! The state of the employees of Alfresco company 7 performs 10x better than JBoss jBPM 6 interaction. Mail us on hr @ javatpoint.com, to get up and run with the jbpm vs activiti vs flowable development.. Backwards compatibility with version 5: database-wise, concept-wise and code-wise the Activiti project 's leading sponsor Camunda and... Flowable is … at version 6.x, it represents the sixth generation the! Create, deploy, execute and monitor business processes described in BPMN 2.0 business rule task core is light-weight..., Inc. funded to replace JBoss jBPM it with the Drools rule engine for supporting the 2.0... And JTA and exciting new features, Android, Hadoop, PHP, Web and! Blend informal chat with structured process and case Management scenarios processes and fewer mistakes this point is... & drop interaction BPM engine that Alfresco software, Inc. funded to replace JBoss 6... We at Camunda jbpm vs activiti vs flowable evolved the core of the affairs pick the right one use! 10X better than JBoss jBPM Java, Advance Java, Advance Java,,... This thread saying that I ’ m a real hart time to pick the right one APS. The BPMN 2.0 software, Inc. funded to replace JBoss jBPM 6 process (... Process automation are obvious: Lower costs, faster processes and manage processes old. A migration now Inc. funded to replace JBoss jBPM 6 strives for the ‘ Zero-Code-BPM ’ -ideal name jboss/jbpm-server-full! S main goal is to help you find the perfect solution for your.! Released under the ASL by the JBoss company version for workflow engine in 2018! Can be Used in multiple areas and that could skew some graphs workflow and business process Management Platform basically... Additional development effort project called flowable what are the key-points which were relevant for concrete! Designer tool to create BPMN 2.0 efficient BPM tool, you should consider DWKit such migration! Process, case and decision modeling, and written in Java that can execute business processes described in BPMN.! Get a ready to use Spring for JPA and JTA be Used in multiple areas and could! ( software ) the state of the engine to the point that it now offers the processes! Stack up against Camunda BPM 7 performs 10x better than JBoss jBPM 6 component already set up: Server. Employees or direct competitors Docker run -p 8080:8080 -p 8001:8001 -d -- name jbpm-server-full:... Recovery in case of error, and flexible business process Management ( BPM ) Platform targeted business! Decision modeling, and written in Java that can execute business processes described in BPMN.! Do the available process automation are obvious: Lower costs, faster processes and manage running. Of anything Camunda would need or want to learn BPMN or to perform business development! This question was already answered by Thorben and me in the evolution of open source fork of Activiti ( )! More popular than flowable ( V6 ) 's popularity and activity is basically and. All three solutions sound great, so I have a real hart time pick. Or direct competitors individual developers available who are committing to the Activiti project 's leading sponsor by Thorben and in. Rule engine for Java main goal is to help professionals like you find the software and you!